Getting to the (Data) Point
In this research summary, we summarize a synthesis of spatial invasive plant data availability and applications in the United States
Fusco, E.J., Beaury, E.M., Bradley, B.A. et al. The invasive plant data landscape: a synthesis of spatial data and applications for research and management in the United States. Landsc Ecol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01623-z
Summary written by Audrey Bowe, edited by Carrie Brown-Lima
Knowing where plants are is an essential component to effective invasive species prevention, management, and research. Particularly in the context of climate change, knowing where invasive plants exist on the landscape can help understand where they’re likely to spread and support early detection and rapid response (EDRR) to climate-driven invaders. In recent decades, invasive species data have been more widely collected and are increasingly accessible, however gaps and limitations in this information still exist. In this study, Fusco et al. seek to improve the understanding and use of these data among researchers and practitioners by synthesizing information on spatial data types and datasets available on invasive plants in the United States. They identify three sources of data: primary (on-the-ground) observation, modeled data, and data repositories, then break down each of these sources further into types with examples of public datasets, as well as potential uses and limitations.
- Invasive plant location data is collected in a myriad of ways, and can be grouped into the following categories:
- Primary observation data types: community science, inventory & monitoring, vegetation community & original research data
- Modeled dataset types: remotely mapped distribution & potential distributions
- Data repository types: data aggregates & data archives
- Each of these types of spatial data has different best uses, limitations, and scale applications (see Table 2 of paper). For example, community science data are cost effective, but records may be unverified. As such, they are useful in supplementing EDRR efforts.
- Data users should consider what kind of datasets will work best for their needs. For example, on-the-ground observations vs. predicted/modeled distributions, or current distribution vs. future predictions.
- The authors recommend to following to facilitate data usability for both researchers and managers:
- Follow FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) principles to maximize use of existing datasets.
- Standardize data collection to increase opportunities for invasive plant map sharing across regions/jurisdictions. For example, NAISMA mapping standards call for collecting a minimum of 1) species, 2) location, 3) area, 4) collection date, and 5) collector.
- In the Northeast, most primary data collection (i.e. locations of invasive plants) are archived to either iMapInvasives or EDDMapS.
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.