Integrating EDRR surveillance with eDNA metabarcoding
Mahon, A.R., Grey, E.K. and Jerde, C.L., 2022. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries. Ecological Applications, p.e2730. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2730
Summary written by Justin Dalaba, edited by Audrey Bowe
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a novel method of determining species presence through DNA extracted from water, air, or soil samples. While eDNA use is expanding, there is much still to be developed, including accurate reference sequence libraries to confirm identification and ensure comprehensive coverage for a particular region. For the well-studied Laurentian Great Lakes region, these questions needed addressing: How complete are current reference libraries for eDNA assessments of biodiversity and invasive species? Can we confidently integrate biodiversity monitoring with early detection of aquatic invasive species? In this recent study, Mahon et al. 1) merge two databases (GAPeDNA and ROTH) to provide a comprehensive list of currently known fish species found in the Laurentian Great Lakes region, 2) look at both global and regional risk assessments and evaluate available reference libraries, 3) screen for sequence coverage of 23 common fish species primer pairs, and 4) compare sequences for the three most commonly used target genes of established Great Lakes species in order to quantify species-specificity. They then synthesized this information to find that 30 out of 278 potentially invasive and established species lack reference sequences and should be prioritized to prevent potential false negative or missed detections. Overall, their results demonstrate that even in the most studied freshwater region, current reference libraries would not be able to detect 24-28% of species present or potentially invasive in the Great Lakes with a metabarcoding approach.
- eDNA metabarcoding that screens for both native and invasive species has significant potential, but gaps in reference libraries exist that limit implementation
- The authors identify 30 potentially or already established invasive species in the Great Lakes Basin that lack reference sequences
- Prioritizing sequencing of missing species for use in metabarcoding surveys in the Great Lakes biodiversity sampling would improve EDRR of invasive species with little extra effort
- This study demonstrates invasive species risk assessments can be used to prioritize invasive species missing from reference libraries, however improving coverage at a local and regional scale will likely fall to agencies tasked with managing invasive species
- Adding new reference sequences to libraries will improve coverage, but current approaches will unlikely achieve complete coverage without complementary approaches such as species-specific PCRs to help reduce false positives and missed detections
- Combining eDNA metabarcoding with conventional detection (e.g. traps, nets, electrofishing) would improve EDRR and calibration of fish community sampling
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.