A Place to Pool Data on Potential Plant Invasions
Culley, T.M., Dreisilker, K., Clair Ryan, M. et al. The potential role of public gardens as sentinels of plant invasion. Biodivers Conserv 31, 1829–1844 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02391-z
Summary written by Justin Dalaba, edited by Audrey Bowe
Public gardens have been called upon to adopt measures for preventing new plant invasions, but lack a formal mechanism for communicating about problematic plants. This study informs how public gardens can collectively contribute data for potential new invaders.
An unfortunate reality of the horticulture trade is that many desirable traits of ornamental plants such as rapid growth, environmental adaptability, and pest resistance are also associated with invasiveness. While North American public gardens have worked to integrate conservation goals, occasional escapes from cultivation can create a perceived tension with horticulture goals (e.g. propagating new plant varieties). Following the 2002 St. Louis Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Botanic Gardens and Arboreta, which calls upon the public garden sector to take significant action to address invasive species, many gardens have independently taken steps to generate escaped plant lists and weed risk assessments, but not in an organized framework. In this paper, Culley et al. compiled and categorized data on escaped plants by using lists of problematic plant species developed independently by seven different public gardens. Using the USDA PLANTS database or EDDMapS, they classified 589 species by habit (tree, vine, shrub, herb) and compared against respective invasive species within the garden’s geographic region. Seven species were listed as escaping cultivation by all seven gardens, and pooled data (including parental species and cultivars) yielded 769 species listed as problematic at one or more gardens. The authors identified inconsistencies in the methods used by gardens to develop escaped plant lists, and few shared their data with other stakeholders, limiting their capacity to serve in a sentinel function. Significantly more gardens identified species as problematic than the number of states that recognized that species as already invasive, underscoring the value public gardens can hold as sentinels for new invasions. After comparing different methodologies across gardens, the authors propose the below guidelines based on consensus for standardized data collection.
The authors propose that all public gardens should:
1. Develop and maintain a sentinel list for collected plant taxa observed escaping both within and beyond their property bounds
2. Assign knowledgeable staff and volunteers with appropriate expertise to make accurate observations of plant spread and behavior
3. Tier their lists using standardized categories, such as invasive, potentially invasive, watchlist, and assessed as invasive, defined by parameters that can be readily assessed through observation
4. Prioritize policy and management recommendations for potentially invasive species, balancing plant collection goals with conservation goals
5. Make their sentinel lists available by means of a shared restricted-access database (see: http://pgsip.mortonarb.org/Bol/pgsip)
6. Periodically reassess species and their cultivars to update lists as spread could gradually increase over time (e.g. with climate change)
Public gardens are in a unique position to form a sentinel network to aid in detecting potential invasive species. An organized framework for pooled garden data and information sharing could form an early warning system while influencing policies on how to handle potentially invasive species. Without this work, plants may escape notice until populations are too large to effectively eradicate.
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.