Declining readability of research on biological invasions over two decades
Hulme, P. E., & Mclaren-Swift, H. (2022). Declining readability of research on biological invasions over two decades. Biological Invasions, 24(6), 1651-1660. doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02740-7
Summary written by Justin Dalaba
Should scientific research be pitched to inform scientific peers and garner more citations, or should they be written to increase the accessibility of information to less formally trained stakeholders and the general public? Hulme et al. address this dilemma in the context of declining readability for the leading international journal, Biological Invasions.
Widespread dissemination and understanding of up-to-date scientific research is critically important for effectively managing environmental and socioeconomic impacts of invasive species. However, scientific literature is often complex and requires prior knowledge of technical terms and specialized vocabularies. A detailed analysis by Hulme & Mclaren-Swift reveals that since 2001, text from the international leading journal, Biological Invasions, has become less readable for the general public over time. Hulme & Mclaren-Swift used two indices, the Coleman-Liau Index (CLI) and New Dale-Chall index (NDC) to gauge text complexity and the level of education required to understand abstract text. Abstracts were utilized since they are available outside of journal paywalls, and are a main source of information for stakeholders, media, and the general public applying information about invasive species. They found many abstracts were appropriate for higher-level of understanding expected of doctoral researchers and the mean readability was appropriate for university undergraduates. However, the average American adult reads at an eighth-grade level, suggesting a significant readability gap. They also found that complex abstracts attracted more citations, suggesting scientific peers may be more persuaded by technically challenging text.
- An assessment of the leading journal, Biological Invasions, from first publication in 2001 to 2021, revealed a significant decrease in abstract readability with an increase in the level of understanding required by about 2 grade levels (according to the CLI)
- These findings are consistent with evidence from other disciplines, but declining readability was detected over a much shorter time-span for Biological Invasions
- While article citations increased with lower readability of abstracts, interpretability of abstracts is limited to individuals with a university education
- Readability declined most dramatically in countries where English is not a de facto language (based on author’s institutional address)
- Declining readability of research limits the flow of knowledge between researchers and managers, further reinforcing a significant knowing-doing gap
- If research addressing non-native species invasions cannot easily achieve the widest possible readership through readability, then establishing a requirement for additional plain-language summaries may be a solution for journals such as Biological Invasions
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.