Building more inclusive conservation science and practice
Rudd, L.F., Allred, S., Bright Ross, J.G., Hare, D., Nkomo, M.N., Shanker, K., Allen, T., Biggs, D., Dickman, A., Dunaway, M. and Ghosh, R., 2021. Overcoming racism in the twin spheres of conservation science and practice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1962), p.20211871. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1871
Summary written by Justin Dalaba, edited by Carrie Brown-Lima
In recognition of black history month, we are sharing an important paper that reflects on how we can construct a more equal, inclusive, and socially just conservation field.
The field of conservation has an often-unacknowledged history of racism, oppression, and exclusion. While many individuals and organizations are taking meaningful steps toward empowering Black, Indigenous and people of color (BIPOC) communities, there is still much work ahead to overcome racism in conservation science and practice. In this paper, a diverse team representing varying levels of academia, different ethnicities, and fields of specialization, articulates ways in which systemic racism shows up and is perpetuated within mainstream conservation science and practice as well as practical strategies for creating a more inclusive and equitable system. For example, the popular system of designated protected areas is based on a colonial practice designed to maximize production on and extraction from the land, and was instituted at the expense of local people. The authors also discuss obstacles to career success and high-level representation for BIPOC communities, which perpetuate historical inequalities in both research and practice realms. Escaping racist ideologies will require conservation scientists and practitioners to change both individual and collective behaviors, and recommendations are laid out within the paper (Boxes 1:3). Below, we outline a few of the recommended actions from Box 2 to construct more inclusive conservation institutions and organizations. Increasing diversity and perspectives can improve management outcomes, build community capacity, and drive innovation for conservation strategies.
- Develop qualifying assessments for individuals to demonstrate cultural literacy in relation to field sites (e.g. plan for local collaboration and expected socio-economic impact in project proposals)
- Ensure fair dissemination of funds and grants to BIPOC academics, conservation practitioners, and organizations
- Develop new models to ensure BIPOC voices are heard and recognize diverse values and cultures (e.g. enable more diverse participation through balancing in-person and online networking opportunities)
- Avoid ‘parachute science’ by including local partners from question formulation and applied practice through publication and beyond in a meaningful way
- Create opportunities for community-based conservation and management and promote conservation solutions that align with community cultures and values
- Collaborate with colleagues in history, political ecology, geography, and other cognate disciplines to include broader perspective within conservation curricula and research design/implementation
- Question how conservation success is measured (e.g. consider outcomes for local people rather than focusing solely on outcomes for nature)
Read more of our research summaries:
Embracing change in policy with a changing climate
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
Who’s in the driver seat? Reducing stressors not invaders may advance restoration
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
Promising but atypical: New evidence on water chestnut biocontrol host choice and feeding
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
Building more equitable and inclusive practice
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
Time, patience, and biodiversity: a recipe for biotic resistance?
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
Integrating EDRR surveillance with eDNA metabarcoding
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Missed signals: Invasive species noise disrupts native species communication
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Peering into predictors at the spongy moth invasion front
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Teasing apart invasive worm impacts on native species
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.
A Place to Pool Data on Potential Plant Invasions
Public gardens are in a unique position to form a sentinel network to aid in detecting potential invasive species. This study informs how public gardens can collectively contribute data for potential new invaders.
Readability Gap in Biological Invasions Research
How accessible is invasive species literature? A detailed analysis of the leading journal, Biological Invasions, points to a decline in readability for key stakeholders over two decades.