An approach that TIEs together actionable research and management
Morelli, T.L., Brown-Lima, C.J., Allen, J.M., Beaury, E.M., Fusco, E.J., Barker-Plotkin, A., Laginhas, B.B., Quirion, B.R., Griffin, B., McLaughlin, B. and Munro, L., 2021. Translational invasion ecology: Bridging research and practice to address one of the greatest threats to biodiversity. Biological Invasions, 23(11), pp.3323-3335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02584-7
Summary written by Justin Dalaba, edited by Carrie Brown-Lima
It’s time to TIE it all together. In our last research summary of 2021, we’re sharing original work published this year by the Northeast RISCC leadership team. Drawing from past practice, Morelli et al. describe the framework of Translational Invasion Ecology (TIE), which is an approach to addressing the knowing-doing gap between invasive species research, management, and policy. This collaborative process allows each group to contribute their perspective, expertise, and effort throughout the research process to generate new information and solutions to improve invasive species management. The process can be applied to current institutional frameworks, and the authors present examples of where it has already been successfully implemented. The five actionable steps and ideas for implementing TIE within your organization are summarized below.
These steps do not always occur in order, and the starting point to the TIE approach will depend on the context of the problem.
- Define the problem & identify stakeholders – This could start with a knowledge gap that becomes a shared issue through TIE, or with the engagement of different stakeholders to identify shared goals and problems
- Collaborative discussion through boundary spanning – The TIE process hinges on researchers, stakeholders, and decision makers working together to determine needs and desired outcomes. Facilitation by a third-party individual or organization whose mission is to coordinate across boundaries and link to external networks or sources of information (i.e. boundary spanners) can be critical to addressing collaboration barriers.
- Research and practice – Folding in expertise and perspectives from research and practice with regular updates and opportunities for feedback will ensure specific management needs are met and are accessible for implementation.
- Outcomes/outputs – In addition to increased knowledge and ability to manage invasive species, TIE can result in other impactful outcomes, such as peer-reviewed publications, best management practices, tools for monitoring and measuring invasion, access to funding, etc.
- Evaluate and improve – A critical final step is to reflect on successes and failures to improve practices and revisit the TIE process as needed.
Ideas for incorporating TIE within your organization:
- Establish boundary-spanning positions within your organization, or work with an existing boundary-spanning organization to build relationships across disciplines
- Expand your network by prioritizing regular involvement at academic and management-focused conferences and meetings
- Share concrete examples of the TIE process to empower and encourage others
- Measure and report outcomes of TIE, such as indicators of success, impact metrics, and improved management outcomes
This summary has been adapted from the Northeast RISCC management network.
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.